Picking up where last post left off....

"When Congress Commits Treason"
by Raymond S. Kraft
Feb. 4, 2007

An excerpt:

Al Qaeda wants an American retreat, defeat, and surrender in Iraq. So do America's Democrats. Hezbollah wants an American retreat, defeat, and surrender in Iraq. So do America's Democrats. Iran wants an American retreat, defeat, and surrender in Iraq. So do America's Democrats. Muqtada al Sadr wants an American retreat, defeat, and surrender in Iraq. So do America's Democrats. Osama bin Laden wants an American retreat, defeat, and surrender in Iraq. So do America's Democrats. When an American political party aligns itself with the goals, hopes, and ambitions of America's enemies in a time of war, in my view there is only one word for it - Treason.

Today, most of the "leading Democrats" in Congress are falling all over themselves to give aid, comfort, and hope, to the Jihad, the Islamic Resistance Movement, the Islamist movement for the decline and fall of Western Civilization and the ascendance of Jihadist Islam in Iraq and around the world. Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, Harry Reid, and many of the rest give their assurance that with Democrats in power, America will retreat, embrace defeat, and surrender, selling their souls and their country down the river for primary votes and and trucks of money from the Pacifist Left. Here, the ignominious spectacle of Democrats selling out the future freedom of the Iraqi people for votes and dollars. Osama bin Laden once called America "a paper tiger." America's Democrats seem determined to prove him right. Treason for votes. Treason for dollars. Treason as a political calculation. Treason, for revenge on George Bush.

Treason, to put a Democrat in the White House.

Follow that with...

"Dems Move to Limit Bush's War Authority"
by David Espo, Associated Press
Feb. 23, 2007

An excerpt:

Officials said Thursday the precise wording of the measure remains unsettled. One version would restrict American troops in Iraq to fighting al-Qaida, training Iraqi army and police forces, maintaining Iraq's territorial integrity and otherwise proceeding with the withdrawal of combat forces.

Limited to only fighting al-Qaida... Other sources restrict the troops even further declaring who the troops can and cannot fire back upon.... This is insane! Further, it is beyond their legislative authority to declare who the troops can and cannot fight against. Only the president as Commander in Chief has that ability.

As stated in the previous post, what Congress CAN do is completely defund the war effort. But to tell the troops they cannot defend themselves against insurgents is criminal. That is the ultimate effect. Right now troops can't arrest anyone seen deploying an IED or throwing such to kill American troops without testing them for residue. Talk about being hamstrung!

Now Democrats want to limit our troops to fighting only al-Qaida? And just how, pray tell, are they to know who is and is not al-Qaida? It's not like they wear uniforms! The point being, our troops will be unable to fight ANYONE without so much red tape they might as well just stand by and allow insurgents, al-Qaida, Iranian militias, foreign fighters, to do as they will. Not a shot can be fired without first knowing who is firing upon them!

Democrats have succeeded in painting this war as "another Vietnam" not because it IS, but because the Bush Administration hasn't done enough to combat the idiotic label. But democrats, and the Media by extension, have invested in the defeat of America since almost the beginning. They don't report the progress being made on a daily basis, but daily carry instead a scorecard for the enemy. On top of that the esteemed Wolfe Blitzer interviews a retired general who demonstrates using an actual blackhawk helicopter where it is vulnerable! How to shoot it down!

Neal Boortz had this to say:

The Democrats are running full steam ahead with trying to cut off our troops in Iraq and ensure failure and surrender in Iraq. Their latest plan is to push through a piece of legislation revoking Bush's authority to wage war in Iraq. You mean the same authority those same Democrats voted to give George W. Bush in 2002? Yeah..that's the one. So what does this latest legislation do? Read on to find out.

This isn't like the other non-binding resolutions that just disapprove of the war in Iraq or the way it is being handled. No, this one would have teeth. So far, one draft would restrict the troops in Iraq to fighting Al-Qaeda only. Are they kidding? Guess not. So now we have 100 commanders in chief in the United States Senate that are going to decide who the troops can fight and who they can't. Unbelievable...this is what the left calls "limiting the mission."

Instead of trying to tie the hands of our troops in Iraq, the Democrats need to either cut off funding for the war or sit down and shut up. It really makes you wonder just whose payroll these politicians are on these days. The Islamic fascists who want us dead must be partying BIG TIME!

The Democratic party, as an institution, IS treasonous. They ARE cowards. And no amount of makeup will make that "Ass" an Arabian Stallion.

The simple truth is, Democrats CANNOT be trusted with National Security, or with the prosecution of War. They are cowards. They are Traitors. They have no Honor. And I, like Dick Cheney, refuse to take it back. I can't take back Truth.