How About This Ridiculous Poll?
CNN, perhaps knowing they'd be unable to squeeze anything of relevance from the "Hate-Bush" carcass today, prepared perhaps the most irrelevant bit of caca to date in the form of a Poll. Gotta have news, right? And if pickings are slim, just make it up! So here's the link--
"Poll: Bush would lose an election if held this year"
Bush would lose an election... to Democrats... Really? And, um... why would he be running? He can't run for President a 3rd time; the 22nd amendment killed any hope of a 3rd term. And why... no, really! Why would George W. Bush run for any office after serving as President of the United States of America? It's simply not done!!!
The MSM is desperate for Bash-Bush fodder to keep the blue-painted faces of their unwashed barbarian hordes in their continued state of frenzied "frothing-at-the-mouth" hatred for G.W.Bush. The media is out of control. Completely out of control. They are not interested in fairness. Only a deluded fool would argue the point. They care about only one thing... Destroy all Rebublican's! Destroy all Conservatives!! Destroy all Christians!!!
Destroy !!!
Destroy !!!!
Destroy!!!!!!!
MWAH HA HA HA HA HA Ha Ha ha haaaw!!! [robotic arms maniacally flailing about]
I think that's enough to push "Mister" Kambon's face down the page.
"Poll: Bush would lose an election if held this year"
Bush would lose an election... to Democrats... Really? And, um... why would he be running? He can't run for President a 3rd time; the 22nd amendment killed any hope of a 3rd term. And why... no, really! Why would George W. Bush run for any office after serving as President of the United States of America? It's simply not done!!!
The MSM is desperate for Bash-Bush fodder to keep the blue-painted faces of their unwashed barbarian hordes in their continued state of frenzied "frothing-at-the-mouth" hatred for G.W.Bush. The media is out of control. Completely out of control. They are not interested in fairness. Only a deluded fool would argue the point. They care about only one thing... Destroy all Rebublican's! Destroy all Conservatives!! Destroy all Christians!!!
Destroy !!!
Destroy !!!!
Destroy!!!!!!!
MWAH HA HA HA HA HA Ha Ha ha haaaw!!! [robotic arms maniacally flailing about]
*****
I think that's enough to push "Mister" Kambon's face down the page.
from the mind of... Eric | 11:36 AM
4 Comments:
Thanks for moving the face!
Good posts, BTW.
EL, I'm gonna answer your question as if you really didn't know already. This poll is a way to gauge how the country feels about it's choice in the previous presidential election. What it means is that a lot of people who voted for GW, would have chosen John Kerry instead if they had known how the past year would have been. It also is important for all those presidential hopefuls in your party for the next presidential election. They should be closely examining this data to see if they want to be identified with GW when the next election comes around. With poll numbers like this Bill Frist may not want to try riding GW's coat tails into the Whitehouse in 2008. If George W. Bush wants to smooth the way for a Republican like himself, to follow as the next POTUS, then he needs to work on reversing his poll numbers.
There were simillar polls taken in Bill Clinton's second term. I don't recall you making much fuss about those.
It's not news. It's fabrication.
"...it means is that a lot of people who voted for GW, would have chosen John Kerry instead if they had known how the past year would have been."
It's an irrelevant point. No one could have known today's news last November. By your own logic, would Clinton have won his first election had this nation understood the scandals his own term in office would have yielded? It's a worthless, pointless argument.
BTW... r you heading 2 Katie's Party this afternoon?
No I can't get to Katie's. I'm doing my own thing today. I finally finished all the work, and now i can enjoy the reward.
Is Sear's wrong to do customer satisfaction surveys about people who bought a new washer? A buyers remorse survey like this can help the RNC start figuring out what the '08 candidate should say to get elected. If people wouldn't vote for George Bush again, then the '08 candidate better not look, sound or act like George Bush. It also is a guide to Congreessional candidates in '06. If people wouldn't vote for George Bush then, Congress candidate A better not have a commercial showing him prmoting George Bush's agenda.
People might still have voted for Clinton even if they knew the scandals his term would bring. He also paid off the national debt. He reformed the welfare system. He reduced national spending. Has GW been able to do anything notable in his second term though? If he can't do something soon before he reaches lame duck status, this buyer's remorse trend may only grow.
Post a Comment
<< Home