Pocket Full of Mumbles

What's done is done, and this puppy's done. Visit me over at Pearls & Lodestones

Thursday, August 31, 2006

Whoa!!! Are You Kidding Me?!?

What follows are a few highlights from an article I found while exploring links contained within a site I linked to in one of yesterdays posts. Proof that there are Christians out there [assuming they are Christian] who just don't get it, and have SERIOUSLY strayed from the faith...


Like anal sex, oral sex is the subject of much confusion and disagreement among the faithful. There are those who say that oral sex is unnatural because God did not intend our mouths to be used in such a manner. Others associate oral-genital contact with the sexual depravities of Sodom and Gomorrah. As you will see in the Scripture, neither one of these views is supported. Not only that, but oral sex has benefits that are of particular importance to Christians: oral sex allows the natural prevention of unwanted pregnancy and is an alternative to premarital intercourse for those committed to preserving their chastity before marriage.

There is nothing in the Bible that forbids engaging in acts of oral-genital contact. Oral sex has wrongly been grouped in with "sodomy" and the sexual sins of Sodom and Gomorrah. As we have seen with anal sex, this argument does not hold water, because the sins of the Sodomites were specifically homosexual and/or nonconsensual in nature. There is no way this could be extrapolated to argue against a heterosexual act of oral sex for mutual pleasure. On the other hand, the Bible does contain some favorable references to oral sex, some in poetic language and some more explicit.


1) I agree in that oral sex is not heinous or sinful within the confines of marriage.

2) I completely DISAGREE that oral sex is an acceptable substitute for intercourse for the 'pre-married'. It's called forn-i-ca-tion.

3) And I agree that in regard to the sins of the Sodomites, though I can't speak for God. I'm sure therre's more to it htan just that. Sodom and Gomorrah weren't destroyed because of their inhospitable treatment of Lot's guests. Lot's guests were there to remove Lot and his family because of the sins Sodom and Gomorrah had already heaped upon themselves.

Okay, now for something surprisingly... chauvinistic.

In the New Testament, this passage directs partners to render "benevolence" to one another, which can be extended to performing oral sex on each other as part of their duty to the Lord and one another: Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband. (Corinthians 7:33) Not only does this passage imply that oral sex between a man and woman is acceptable and desirable, but as we shall see, the Bible also provides more specific edicts concerning the completion of the oral sex act, namely swallowing the male emission.


WHAT?!? Does the bible really say that?!? Hmmm, lets go a bit further...

Most of us are familiar with the Biblical story of Onan, whose sin against God was that of spilling his seed on the ground (Genesis 38:9)... This scriptural passage has traditionally been used as an injunction against masturbation. However, upon closer reading, it becomes apparent that this scenario has nothing to do with masturbation at all. Onan was not masturbating; he was copulating with his brother’s wife (and there was a good reason for that, in God’s plan). His sin was pulling out (coitus interruptus) and ejaculating on the ground rather than into the woman. He did so in order to avoid impregnating her. However, he could have easily avoided God’s wrath (and the penalty of death), by simply having the woman fellate him and then swallow his semen. This would have kept him from impregnating her, as well as completely prevented the spilling of seed that was an offense in God’s eyes.


Uhhh. I think Onan's sin was not performing his duty as commanded by God; namely raising children unto his dead brother. Well, that's what I think anyway.

Now here's where the article trips irrevocably into the realm of blasphemy...

The Benefits of Swallowing - Drink of the Living Water
Aside from swallowing semen as a measure to prevent the waste and spillage of seed, ingesting ejaculate can have spiritual benefits, as we will see. Although the Old Testament makes reference to the bitterness of semen (And he shall cause the woman to drink the bitter water. [Numbers 5:24]), the New Testament casts the act of consuming ejaculate in a much more affirming light, as in the following passage, where Jesus speaks to the woman of Samaria about the gift of “living water”:

               Jesus answered her, "If you knew the gift of
               God, and who it is that is saying to you, "Give
               me a drink,' you would have asked him, and he
               would have given you living water." The woman
               said to him, "Sir, you have no bucket, and the
               well is deep. Where do you get that living water?
               The woman said to him, "Sir, give me this water,
               so that I may never be thirsty or have to keep
               coming here to draw water." Jesus said to her,
               "Go, call your husband, and come back."
               --John 4:10-16

"Living water" in this context refers to semen, which literally is the liquid of life. As Christ indicates, drinking of the "living water" provides a spiritual replenishment for the soul. When the woman asks Jesus where she can get this "water", he tells her to fetch her husband, clearly with the intention of instructing her on how to fellate him and swallow his semen.

Oral Sex in Christ
In summary, we can say that the Scripture supports and even encourages the act of oral sex between loving heterosexual partners. Moreover, the Bible specifically encourages fellatio to completion (orgasm) with the female partner consuming or swallowing the ejaculate. This prevents spilling seed, which is an affront to the Lord, and also provides spiritual benefit to the receiving partner. Oral sex has the added benefits of preventing unwanted pregnancies and helping couples satisfy their sexual urges while preserving their chastity until marriage. For these reasons, all Christian men and women should feel confident and comfortable including oral sex as part of their sexual life in accordance with God’s will.



I take it back. The person who wrote this is completely ignorant of the truths of God. I doubt the person who wrote this is saved at all. There's some sick stuff out there so be careful everyone, not every spirit if of the Lord.

You don't want to know what this guy thinks about anal sex. The man is sick.

8 Comments:

Blogger Erudite Redneck said...

Whoa. Weird. Gross. Waaaay out there.

But, I think you are way too quick to put "blasphemy" bullets in your Gospel Gun, man.

Interesting to me that those who are quick to accuse those with whom they disagree on matters of faith of blasphemy also are quick to accuse people with whom they disagree on matters of politics and government of being traitors. Too quick.

But, as for this post: Ewwwwww.

August 31, 2006 8:44 PM  
Blogger Erudite Redneck said...

On the other hand ... "Fisting and God's Will" and "Threesomes within a Christian Marriage"?

What are the chances that this is an elaborate, well-written farce? A joke site?

August 31, 2006 8:49 PM  
Blogger Eric said...

Honestly, I don't think it's a hoax. There's a lot of strange people out there... moreso on the web than on TV.

August 31, 2006 9:04 PM  
Blogger Eric said...

Fisting... EWWWWWWWW!

August 31, 2006 9:04 PM  
Blogger Eric said...

What I found blasphemous was the authors ascertion that Jesus wanted to teach the woman at the well how to give head. THAT is most certainly blasphemous. Jesus was the living water-- His truth, His gospel, His sacrifice... NOT her husband's semen, which as it happens wasn't really her husband.

August 31, 2006 9:08 PM  
Blogger Erudite Redneck said...

Well, I retain the old Baptist concept of blasphemy as The Unforgiveable Sin, which is the ultimate rejection of God's grace.

If one is saved, then that is impossible.

If one is not saved, one's eternal goose is already cooked so to speak, and adding "blasphemy" to it is meaningless.

Glancing at definitions for "blasphemy," I see that "contempt" is part of it.

Nothing contemptuous in that weird piece of writing. Profane, yes. Sacrilegious? No doubt. Blasphemous? Eh.

I will resist the urge to google "semen" and "drinking" and "African" and "tribe" for fear of what I'd get. But I seem to remember hearing tell of a tribe or tribes that had ceremonial drinking of semen, by young men, as part of a ritual transferring of "energy" or "life" or some such. The idea, as repugnant to us as it is, is not as farfetched as it sounds, minus the biblical part.

Oh, what the hey. I'm googling it.

August 31, 2006 10:17 PM  
Blogger Erudite Redneck said...

My geography was off, but not my memory:

"It was in the Melanesian culture area—encompassing Papua-New Guinea—where, well into the 20th century, the erotic—in fact homoerotic—energy of male initiation was perhaps most clearly evident (Tejirian, 1990). There, transactions of semen between older and younger males were a pervasive feature of male initiation. Among the “Sambia” with whom anthropologist Gilbert Herdt lived, boys were turned into men by being isolated from their mothers. Living in proximity with adolescent boys, it was necessary that they perform fellatio on the older, sexually mature boys since it was thought that only by the ingestion of semen on a regular basis would they be able to mature sexually themselves."

From:
http://www.apa.org/
divisions/div51/
Summer%202006%20Bulletin/06.htm

August 31, 2006 10:32 PM  
Blogger Dan Trabue said...

ummm...pass.

August 31, 2006 10:41 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home